University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign logo.

Crop Sciences

College of Agricultural, Consumer, and Environmental Sciences
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Evaluation of Sunn Hemp as a Cover Crop for No-Tillage Corn

S. A. Ebelhar and M. P. Plumer

Introduction

Sunn Hemp (Crotalaria juncea) is a tropical legume cover crop with tremendous potential for growth and dry matter accumulation when planted after wheat as a cover crop for corn the following year. It is being evaluated in southern Illinois as a possible substitute for hairy vetch. The cover crops are being evaluated for growth potential, N content and effects on subsequent corn crops.

Sunn hemp was planted at three locations (Dixon Springs Agricultural Center, Ewing Field, and Ralph Upton, Jr. Farm in Springerton) at two different planting dates (mid-July and mid-August) following wheat and at three planting rates (20, 30 and 40 lb/acre). Hairy Vetch was included in the mid-August planting and was drilled at a seeding rate of 20 lb/acre.

Dry matter samples of sunn hemp were taken in mid-November approximately one week after a killing frost. Hairy vetch samples were taken just prior to burndown herbicide application, approximately ten days prior to corn planting.

Results

Dry matter and N content of cover crops. The mid-July planting of sunn hemp had the highest dry matter yield and N content compared to the other covers and planting dates (Table 1). When averaged across the three locations, this planting date produced twice the dry matter of the hairy vetch cover and nearly four times what the mid-August planting date of sunn hemp produced. Cover crop planting rate had no effect on dry matter production (data not shown). At Dixon Springs the hairy vetch and early planted sunn hemp produced about the same amount of dry matter, but because of the higher N concentration of the hairy vetch, the vetch treatment had significantly higher N contents. There was a hairy vetch cover crop failure at Ewing in 1998 when excessive soil wetness cause the vetch to die out during the winter. Excessive wetness also caused reduced vetch growth at Springerton in 1999. The spring at Springerton was very wet with the plots remaining waterlogged for extended periods of time. This would account for the low production from the hairy vetch at this location since hairy vetch does most of it's growing in the late spring. The conditions at all three locations were conducive to grow sunn hemp when planted in mid-July. Only the Dixon Springs location seems to favor hairy vetch over the sunn hemp in terms of N production.

The percent N in the hairy vetch material was about 3.5% whereas the sunn hemp had percent N in the range of 1.5 to 1.75% (data not shown). This indicates that the vetch had a lower C:N ratio and that the N from the vetch would be more readily available to corn than the N from the sunn hemp.


Ear-leaf N concentrations. The hairy vetch cover treatment increased the N concentration in corn ear leaves at each N rate compared to no cover treatment (Table 2). The largest effect of the hairy vetch is with the zero N rate where the leaf N increased from 1.74 to 2.36%. The sunn hemp treatments also increased the ear-leaf N concentrations compared to the no cover treatment, but to a lesser extent than the hairy vetch. This is an indication that the N released from the vetch more readily available than the N in the sunn hemp. At the higher N rates, neither sunn hemp treatment appeared to effectively increase the N levels.

Grain yields. The hairy vetch cover treatment had the highest grain yields, especially at the lower N rates, even though it did not produce the highest dry matter yield and N content. There was a linear response to increasing N rates up to the 120 lb/acre rate, with the greatest benefit occurring at Dixon Springs (Table 3). The hairy vetch with no fertilizer N had much higher yields than the other cover crops with no N. Hairy vetch still appears to be the cover crop choice for no-till corn production in southern Illinois.

There was a significant increase in yields as N rates increased but there was no significant interaction between cover treatments and N rates. There did appear to be a significant increase in yield with hairy vetch covers over the other covers and low N rates, but for the most part fertilizer N was still needed to achieve optimum yields with each of the covers..

Economics. When averaged across N rates the hairy vetch produced an average of 20 bu/acre over the no cover treatments at Dixon Springs. At a cost of about $20 to establish the vetch cover, this was the only economical treatment. At the other locations, the vetch did poorer such that the yield benefits were less and therefore probably not economical. The sunn hemp seed was costly and even at the 20 lb/acre seeding rate would cost $40 or more to establish. Economically, the use of sunn hemp is probably not justified even though it probably did contribute to organic matter production and some improvement in soil quality.

Summary

Planting of the Sunn Hemp to mid-July (after wheat harvest) proved to be quite beneficial in producing high dry matter and N contents. Economically the 20 lb/acre seeding rate of Sunn Hemp is sufficient. Hairy vetch still performs better for grain yields in this area, especially at Dixon Springs. The apparent niche for Sunn Hemp may be where hairy vetch winter kills or grows poorly in the spring because Sunn Hemp produces much of its growth in the late summer (after wheat harvest) and early fall (prior to a killing frost).


Table 1. Summary of dry matter and N contents of cover crops by location, 1998-2000.

 
Dixon Springs
Ewing
Springerton
Ave
 
98
99
00
98
99
00
98
99
00
 
----------------------- lb/acre --------------------------
Dry Matter
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
Early Planted Sunn Hemp
-
2739a
4388a
-
7299a
5039a
-
5689a
3767a
4820
Late Planted Sunn Hemp
1366b
725c
1010c
219a
3823b
1195c
757b
1730b
1242c
1341
Hairy Vetch
3679a
1704b
3522b
0b
2880c
2574b
2945a
1224b
1878b
2267
LSD
262
403
426
80
707
565
139
614
567
&nbsp
 
N Content
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
Early Planted Sunn Hemp
-
55a
90b
-
112a
83b
-
79a
70a
82
Late Planted Sunn Hemp
25b
11b
30c
5a
56c
32c
22b
25b
40b
27
Hairy Vetch
129a
63a
159a
0b
93b
104a
103a
32b
71a
84
LSD
4.1
18.4
16.4
1.7
9.2
18.1
5.4
13.6
18.6
&nbsp
 
MEANS
DS
DW
SP
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
DS
DW
SP
&nbsp
Dry Matter
    N Content
       
Early Planted Sunn Hemp
3564
6169
4728
Early Planted Sunn Hemp
73
98
75
 
Late Planted Sunn Hemp
1034
1746
1243
Late Planted Sunn Hemp
22
31
29
 
Hairy Vetch
2968
1818
2016
Hairy Vetch
117
66
69
 

 

Table 2. Summary of cover and N effects on leaf N concentrations by location, 1998-2000.

Cover
N Rate
Dixon Springs
Ewing
Springerton
Ave
98
99
00
98
99
00
98
99
00
 
&nbsp
----------------- % N in Corn Ear-leaves ----------
Check
0
1.37
1.82
1.76
Data
not
collect-ed
1.73
1.92
1.84
Data
not
collect-ed
1.48
1.74
 
60
1.30
2.95
2.38
3.01
2.16
1.85
2.04
2.53
 
120
1.89
3.32
2.78
3.38
2.48
1.60
2.51
2.89
 
180
1.72
3.38
2.80
3.51
2.70
1.57
2.79
3.04
Early Sunn Hemp
0
-
2.09
1.69
2.26
1.81
-
1.67
1.90
 
60
-
2.96
2.50
3.19
1.88
-
2.19
2.54
 
120
-
3.15
2.91
3.28
2.33
-
2.62
2.86
Late Sunn Hemp
0
1.15
1.81
1.57
2.11
1.84
1.42
1.66
1.80
 
60
1.43
3.04
2.28
3.01
2.12
1.75
2.25
2.54
 
120
1.73
3.38
2.94
3.47
2.46
1.68
2.62
2.97
Hairy Vetch
0
1.88
2.53
1.98
3.05
2.26
1.83
1.99
2.36
 
60
1.53
2.98
2.46
3.39
1.93
1.72
2.60
2.67
 
120
1.62
3.41
2.78
3.58
2.67
2.10
2.63
3.01
 
Contrasts
&nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp
N Rate linear &nbsp
**
**
**
n/a
**
**
*
n/a
**
&nbsp
N Rate quad. &nbsp
**
**
NS
&nbsp
**
*
NS
&nbsp
NS
&nbsp
Cover x N Rate &nbsp
NS
NS
NS
&nbsp
**
NS
NS
&nbsp
NS
&nbsp
10%, * and ** refer to significance at the 10%, 5% and 1% levels, respectively. NS = non-significant.


Table 3.
Summary of cover and N effects on yields by location, 1998-2000.

Cover
N Rate
Dixon Springs
Ewing
Springerton
Ave
98
99
00
Ave
98
99
00
Ave
98
99
00
Ave
 
&nbsp
------------------- bu/acre ---------------------
Check
0
76
81
60
71
38
58
52
55
112
48
66
57
61
 
60
83
123
107
115
53
98
80
89
116
78
87
83
96
 
120
118
124
128
126
87
114
96
105
133
63
117
90
107
 
180
122
129
148
139
90
108
98
103
131
129
129
129
124
Early Sunn Hemp
0
-
88
60
74
-
71
59
65
--
42
71
57
65
 
60
-
118
108
113
-
100
78
89
--
55
104
80
94
 
120
-
134
135
135
-
106
87
97
--
53
117
85
105
Late Sunn Hemp
0
78
79
71
75
45
66
68
67
118
36
68
52
65
 
60
102
130
107
115
62
98
89
94
132
52
108
80
96
 
120
119
130
130
130
96
117
95
106
134
56
120
88
108
Hairy Vetch
0
100
109
95
102
34
110
48
79
112
55
103
79
87
 
60
115
133
134
134
55
116
58
87
114
24
129
77
99
 
120
145
135
138
137
91
115
72
94
134
68
120
94
108
 
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
Contrasts
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
&nbsp
N Rate linear
&nbsp
**
**
**
&nbsp
**
**
**
&nbsp
*
**
**
&nbsp
&nbsp
N Rate quad.
&nbsp
NS
**
**
&nbsp
10%
**
NS
&nbsp
NS
NS
*
&nbsp
&nbsp
Cover x N Rate
&nbsp
NS
NS
NS
&nbsp
NS
*
NS
&nbsp
NS
NS
NS
&nbsp
&nbsp
10%, * and ** refer to significance at the 10%, 5% and 1% levels, respectively. NS = non-significant.

Back to Project Report Listing